Chicago, Illinois Dec 13, 2018 (Issuewire.com) - Defendant, Illinois Cook County Circuit Court Markham Courthouse Supervising Judge Michele McDowell - Pitman, represented by Attorney Ralph E. Meczyk, recently plead ‘No Contest’ before The United States Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ to over 168 COUNTS OF MAIL & WIRE FRAUD, in APPELLATE CIVIL CASE #18-1501: FRANK L. SIMMONS V. ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, ET AL.
The initial $75 million-dollar Civil Suit brought by former spouse and Plaintiff, Frank L. Simmons, alleges Judge McDowell- Pitman conspired with persons employed within AT&T’s Court Order Unit whom knowingly enforced NUMEROUS COUNTERFEIT CIRCUIT COURT ORDERS by PITMAN from years 2009 through 2016.
The counterfeit orders were used to illegally garner Mr Simmons assets, including Intellectual Property, and hundreds of thousands of dollars of salary and pension benefits while he was employed as a design engineer at AT&T - ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY.
The Civil Complaint details some of the domestic violence abuses PITMAN committed against Mr Simmons throughout their 20-year marriage. In particular, JUDGE PITMAN, conspired with friends and family members employed within AT&T Services, Inc.’s Court Order Unit in Missouri whom knowingly concealed and enforced bogus County Circuit Court Orders forged by PITMAN as wage garnishments to skim Mr. Simmons’ salary and pension benefits, in addition to stealing his personal email account containing Intellectual Property.
AT&T INC. contends the suit to be frivolous and admits to no wrongdoing in their court pleadings, yet acknowledges, to having received numerous invalid court orders from PITMAN, which the Company enforced against Mr Simmons’ employee benefits and personal assets.
Moreover, in spite of PITMAN’s recent admissions of fraud to the U.S. Court of Appeals, AT&T continues to offer no ample reason for its failure to comply with initial court ordered discovery requests to submit PITMAN’s fraudulent court orders into evidence or account for the Plaintiff’s stolen email account.
The current $75 million suit addresses AT&T’s fiduciary neglect to Mr Simmons as a customer, employee, and shareholder and is but a portion of the estimated total $575 million in damages sought by the Plaintiff. A prominent undisclosed international bank currently valued aspects of the Intellectual Property stolen in 2009’ by PITMAN and AT&T at $150 million in the documentation presented to investors for which the Plaintiff is liable. There is no statute of limitations for crimes of theft and forgery.
Moreover, with each overt act, which means, by even stating publicly that one did nothing wrong, constitutes, an overt act on their behalf in ‘Furtherance of The Conspiracy’, which then renews the 5-year statute of limitations from that point.
Moreover, since the filing of this case, current and former employees of AT&T have come forward with unexplained payroll deductions similar to the payroll skimming fraud alleged in Mr Simmons’ civil complaint. In addition, the Justice Department also granted Mr Simmons a second un-issued ‘Right to Sue for ‘Wrongful Termination’, pending the outcome of these proceedings.
It is important to Note: The Court Order Unit of AT&T Services, Inc., acting on behalf of AT&T Inc., is the very same unit charged with receiving and enforcing Federal National Security Agency (NSA) Court Ordered Requests in the interest of national security as detailed in the 33 civil cases consolidated under HEPTING v. AT&T INC.
The Plaintiff contends that those private entities called upon to act in the interest of our nation’s national security be vetted for the highest level of moral character and that procedural checks & balances be instituted which restrict these entities from creating fraudulent mayhem to the records and services managed and provided to customers, employees, and the government.
Moreover, establish that practices ensure fact-based accountability and expeditious remedy to complaints in order to guard against the fraudulent wrongs experienced by Mr Simmons.
NOTE: The Plaintiff DOES NOT state nor wish to imply in any way that the National Security Agency (NSA) was party to the fraudulent acts committed by AT&T in this matter.
Frank Simmons v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company, et al (0:18-cv-01501) Courts > Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Filed: Mar 05, 2018 Nature of Suit: Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights
Media Contact
Plaintiff: Frank L. Simmons judicialcorruption.chicago@gmail.com 1-312-919-9320 https://www.socialin.live/judicial-corruption-in-chicago-trumps-a-new-high-supervising-judge-pitman-pleas-no-contest-to-
